Testing the Nikon Z6 for Astrophotography

Nikon Z Title

I put the new Nikon Z6 mirrorless camera through its paces for astrophotography. 

Following Sony’s lead, in late 2018 both Nikon and Canon released their entries to the full-frame mirrorless camera market. 

Here I review one of Nikon’s new mirrorless models, the Z6, tested solely with astrophotography in mind. I did not test any of the auto-exposure, auto-focus, image stabilization, nor rapid-fire continuous mode features. 

For full specs and details on the Z-series cameras see Nikon USA’s website.

Sony a7III vs Nikon Z6 copy

In my testing I compared the Nikon Z6 (at right above) to two competitive cameras, the relatively new Sony a7III mirrorless (at left above) and 2015-vintage Nikon D750 DSLR.

All three are “entry-level” full-frame cameras, with 24 megapixels and in a similar $2,000 price league, though the older D750 now often sells at a considerable discount.


I should state at the outset that my conclusions are based on tests conducted over only three weeks in mid-winter 2019 while I had the camera on loan from Nikon Canada’s marketing company. 

I don’t own the camera and didn’t have many moonless nights during the loan period to capture a lot of “beauty” shots under the stars with the Z6.

Auroral Arc (January 10, 2019)
An arc of the auroral oval across the northern horizon on the night of January 10-11, 2019. With the Sigma 14mm lens and Nikon Z6 for testing.

However, I think my testing was sufficient to reveal the camera’s main traits of interest — as well as deficiencies it might have — for astrophotography.

I should also point out that I do not participate in “affiliate links,” so I have no financial motivation to prompt you to buy gear from merchants. 

But if you buy my ebook (at right), which features reams of sections on camera and time-lapse gear, I would be very pleased! 

TL;DR Conclusions

In short — I found the Nikon Z6 superb for astrophotography. 

Nikon Z6 Screens copy


• It offers as low a noise level as you’ll find in a 24-megapixel full-frame camera, though its noise was not significantly lower than the competitive Sony a7III, nor even the older Nikon D750. 

• The Z6’s ISO-invariant sensor proved excellent when dealing with the dark underexposed shadows typical of Milky Way nightscapes.

• The Live View was bright and easy to enhance to even brighter levels using the Movie mode to aid in framing nightscapes. 

• When shooting deep-sky images through telescopes using long exposures, the Z6 did not exhibit any odd image artifacts such as edge vignetting or amplifier glows, unlike the Sony a7III. See my review of that camera in my blog from 2018. 


• Current owners of Nikon cropped-frame cameras wanting to upgrade to full-frame would do well to consider a Z6 over any current Nikon DSLR. 

• Anyone wanting a full-frame camera for astrophotography and happy to “go Nikon” will find the Z6 nearly perfect for their needs. 

Nikon Z6 vs. Z7

Nikon Front View copy

I opted to test the Z6 over the more expensive Z7, as the 24-megapixel Z6 has 6-micron pixels resulting in lower noise (according to independent tests) than the 46 megapixel Z7 with its 4.4 micron pixels. 

In astrophotography, I feel low noise is critical, with 24-megapixel cameras hitting a sweet spot of noise vs. resolution.

However, if the higher resolution of the Z7 is important for your daytime photography needs, then I’m sure it will work well at night. The Nikon D850 DSLR, with a sensor similar to the Z7, has been proven by others to be a good astrophotography camera, albeit with higher noise than the lesser megapixel Nikons such as the D750 and Z6.

NOTE: Tap or click on images to download and display them full screen for closer inspection.

High ISO Noise

Comparison - Noise at 3 ISOs
The three 24-megapixel cameras compared at three high ISO levels in a close-up of a dark-sky nightscape.

To test noise in a real-world situation, I shot a dark nightscape scene with the three cameras, using a 24mm Sigma Art lens on the two Nikons, and a 24mm Canon lens on the Sony via a MetaBones adapter. I shot at ISOs from 800 to 12,800, typical of what we use in nightscapes and deep-sky images. 

The comparison set above shows performance at the higher ISOs of 3200 to 12,800. I saw very little difference among the trio, with the Nikon Z6 very similar to the Sony a7III, and with the four-year-old Nikon D750 holding up very well against the two new cameras. 

The comparison below shows the three cameras on another night and at ISO 3200.

Noise at 3200-3 Cameras
The three cameras compared for noise at properly exposed moonlit scenes at ISO 3200, a typical nightscape setting.

Both the Nikon Z6 and Sony a7III use a backside illuminated or “BSI” sensor, which in theory is promises to provide lower noise than a conventional CMOS sensor used in an older camera such as the D750. 

In practice I didn’t see a marked difference, certainly not as much as the one- or even 1/2-stop improvement in noise I might have expected or hoped for.

Nevertheless, the Nikon Z6 provides as low a noise level as you’ll find in a camera offering 24 megapixels, and will perform very well for all forms of astrophotography. 

ISO Invariance

Comparison - ISO Invariancy
The three cameras compared for ISO invariance at 0EV (well exposed) and -5EV (5 stops underexposed then brightened in processing).

Nikon and Sony both employ an “ISO-invariant” signal flow in their sensor design. You can purposely underexpose by shooting at a lower ISO, then boost the exposure later “in post” and end up with a result similar to an image shot at a high ISO to begin with in the camera. 

I find this feature proves its worth when shooting Milky Way nightscapes that often have well-exposed skies but dark foregrounds lit only by starlight. Boosting the brightness of the landscape when developing the raw files reveals details in the scene without unduly introducing noise, banding, or other artifacts such as magenta tints. 

That’s not true of “ISO variant” sensors, such as in most Canon cameras. Such sensors are far less tolerant of underexposure and are prone to noise, banding, and discolouration in the brightened shadows.

See my test of the Canon 6D MkII for its performance under the differing demands of nightscape photography and deep-sky imaging.

To test the Z6’s ISO invariance (as shown above) I shot a dark nightscape at ISO 3200 for a properly exposed scene, and also at ISO 100 for an image underexposed by a massive 5 stops. I then boosted that image by 5 stops in exposure in Adobe Camera Raw. That’s an extreme case to be sure. 

I found the Z6 provided very good ISO invariant performance, though with more chrominance specking than the Sony a7III and Nikon D750 at -5 EV.

Below is a less severe test, showing the Z6 properly exposed on a moonlit night and at 1 to 4 EV steps underexposed, then brightened in processing. Even the -4 EV image looks very good.

Comparison-ISO Invariancy in Moonlight
This series taken under moonlight shows that even images underexposed by -4 EV in ISO and boosted later by +4 EV in processing look similar for noise and image quality as an image properly exposed in the camera (at ISO 800 here).

In my testing, even with frames underexposed by -5 EV, I did not see any of the banding effects (due to the phase-detect auto-focus pixels) reported by others. 

As such, I judge the Z6 to be an excellent camera for nightscape shooting when we often want to extract detail in the shadows or dark foregrounds. 

Compressed vs. Uncompressed / Raw Large vs. Small 

Comparison - Z6 Large vs Medium RAW
Comparing Z6 images shot at full resolution and at Medium Raw size. to show resolution and noise differences.

The Z6, as do many Nikons, offers a choice of shooting 12-bit or 14-bit raws, and either compressed or uncompressed. 

I shot all my test images as 14-bit uncompressed raws, yielding 46 megabyte files with a resolution of 6048 x 4024 pixels. So I cannot comment on how good 12-bit compressed files are compared to what I shot. Astrophotography demands the best original data. 

Z6 Menu - Raw Formats

However, as the menu above shows, Nikon now also offers the option of shooting smaller raw sizes. The Medium Raw setting produces an image 4528 x 3016 pixels and a 18 megabyte file (in the files I shot), but with all the benefits of raw files in processing.

Nikon with Card Slot copy
The Z cameras use the XQD style memory cards and in a single card slot. The fast XQDs are ideal for recording 4K movies at high data rates but are more costly than the more common SD cards.

The Medium Raw option might be attractive when shooting time-lapses, where you might need to fit as many frames onto the single XQD card as possible, yet still have images large enough for final 4K movies. 

However, comparing a Large Raw to a Medium Raw did show a loss of resolution, as expected, with little gain in noise reduction. 

This is not like “binning pixels” in CCD cameras to increase signal-to-noise ratio. I prefer to never throw away information in the camera, to allow the option of creating the best quality still images from time-lapse frames later. 

Nevertheless, it’s nice to see Nikon now offer this option on new models, a feature which has long been on Canon cameras. 

Star Image Quality

Orion Nebula, M42 and M43, with Nikon Z6
The Orion Nebula with the Nikon Z6
The Orion Nebula in Moonlight
The Orion Nebula with the Nikon D750

Above is the Orion Nebula with the D750 and with the Z6, both shot in moonlight with the same 105mm refractor telescope.

I did not find any evidence for “star-eating” that Sony mirrorless cameras have been accused of. (However, I did not find the Sony a7III guilty of eating stars either.) Star images looked as good in the Z6 as in the D750. 

M42 Blow-up in ACR
A single Orion Nebula image with the Z6 in a 600% blow-up in Adobe Camera Raw, showing clean artifact-free star images with good, natural colours.

Raw developers (Adobe, DxO, ON1, and others) decoded the Z6’s Bayer-array NEF files fine, with no artifacts such as oddly-coloured or misshapen stars, which can arise in cameras lacking an anti-alias filter. 

LENR Dark frames 

Z6 Dark Frame- No LENR
A blank long exposure with no LENR applied – click or tap to open the image full screen
Z6 Dark Frame-With LENR
A blank long exposure with LENR – tap or click to open the image full screen

Above, 8-minute exposures of nothing, taken with the lens cap on at room temperature: without LENR, and with LENR, both boosted a lot in brightness and contrast to exaggerate the visibility of any thermal noise. These show the reduction in noise speckling with LENR activated, and the clean result with the Z6. At small size you’ll likely see nothing but black!

For deep-sky imaging a common practice is to shoot “dark frames,” images recording just the thermal noise that can then be subtracted from the image. 

The Long Exposure Noise Reduction feature offered by all cameras performs this dark frame subtraction internally and automatically by the camera for any exposures over one second long. 

I tested the Z6’s LENR and found it worked well, doing the job to effectively reduce thermal noise (hot pixels) without adding any other artifacts. 

Z6 iMenu Screen
The rear screen “i” menu as I had it customized for my testing, with functions for astrophotography such as LENR assigned to the 12 boxes.


Some astrophotographers dismiss LENR and never use it. By contrast, I prefer to use LENR to do dark frame subtraction. Why? Through many comparison tests over the years I have found that separate dark frames taken later at night rarely do as good a job as LENR darks, because those separate darks are taken when the sensor temperature, and therefore the noise levels, are different than they were for the “light” frames. 

I’ve found that dark frames taken later, then subtracted “in post” inevitably show less or little effect compared to images taken with LENR darks. Or worse, they add a myriad of pock-mark black specks to the image, adding noise and making the image look worse.

The benefit of LENR is lower noise. The penalty of LENR is that each image takes twice as long to shoot — the length of the exposure + the length of the dark frame. Because …

As Expected on the Z6 … There’s no LENR Dark Frame Buffer

Only Canon full-frame cameras offer this little known but wonderful feature for astrophotography. Turn on LENR and it is possible to shoot three (with the Canon 6D MkII) or four (with the Canon 6D) raw images in quick succession even with LENR turned on. The Canon 5D series also has this feature. 

The single dark frame kicks in and locks up the camera only after the series of “light frames” are taken. This is excellent for taking a set of noise-reduced deep-sky images for later stacking without need for further “image calibration.” 

No Nikon has this dark frame buffer, not even the “astronomical” D810a. And not the Z6.


I have to mention this every time I describe Canon’s dark frame buffer: It works only on full-frame Canons, and there’s no menu function to activate it. Just turn on LENR, fire the shutter, and when the first exposure is complete fire the shutter again. Then again for a third, and perhaps a fourth exposure. Only then does the LENR dark frame lock up the camera as “Busy” and prevent more exposures. That single dark frame gets applied to each of the previous “light” frames, greatly reducing the time it takes to shoot a set of dark-frame subtracted images. 

But do note that Canon’s dark frame buffer will not work if…:

a) You leave Live View on. Don’t do that for any long exposure shooting.

b) You control the camera through the USB port via external software. It works only when controlling the camera via its internal intervalometer or via the shutter port using a hardware intervalometer.

Sensor Illumination 

M35 with Z6 & Traveler (4 Minutes)
A single 4-minute exposure of Messier 35 in moonlight at ISO 400 with the Z6 and 105mm apo refractor, with no flat fielding or lens correction applied, showing the clean edges and lack of amp glows. The darkening of the corners is inherent in the telescope optical system and is not from the camera.

With DSLRs deep-sky images shot through telescopes, then boosted for contrast in processing, usually exhibit a darkening along the bottom of the frame. This is caused by the upraised mirror shadowing the sensor slightly, an effect never noticed in normal photography. 

Mirrorless cameras should be free of this mirror box shadowing. The Sony a7III, however, still exhibits some edge shadows due to an odd metal mask in front of the sensor. It shouldn’t be there and its edge darkening is a pain to eliminate in the final processing. 

As I show in my review of the a7III, the Sony also exhibits a purple edge glow in long-exposure deep-sky images, from an internal light source. That’s a serious detriment to its use in deep-sky imaging.

Happily, the Z6 proved to be free of any such artifacts. Images are clean and evenly illuminated to the edges, as they should be. I saw no amp glows or other oddities that can show up under astrophotography use. The Z6 can produce superb deep-sky images. 

Red Sensitivity

M97 with Z6 & Traveler (4 Minutes)
Messer 97 planetary nebula and Messier 108 galaxy in a lightly processed single 4-minute exposure at ISO 1600 with the 105mm refractor, again showing a clean field. The glow at top right is from a Big Dipper star just off the edge of the field.

During my short test period, I was not able to shoot red nebulas under moonless conditions. So I can’t say how well the Z6 performs for recording H-alpha regions compared to other “stock” cameras. 

However, I would not expect it to be any better, nor worse, than the competitors. Indeed, the stock Nikon D750 I have does a decent job at picking up red nebulas, though nowhere near as well as Nikon’s sadly discontinued D180a. See my blog post from 2015 for an example shot with that camera. 

With the D810a gone, if it is deep red nebulosity you are after with a Nikon, then consider buying a filter-modified Z6 or having yours modified. 

Both LifePixel and Spencer’s Camera offer to modify the Z6 and Z7 models. However, I have not used either of their services, so cannot vouch for them first hand. 

Live View Focusing and Framing 

Z6 Live View Screen
An image of the back of the camera with a scene under moonlight, with the Z6 set to the highest ISO speed in the movie mode, to aid framing the scene at night.

For all astrophotography manually focusing with Live View is essential. And with mirrorless cameras there is no optical viewfinder to look through to frame scenes. You are dependent on the live electronic image (on the rear LCD screen or in the eye-level electronic viewfinder, or EVF) for seeing anything.

Thankfully, the Z6 presents a bright Live View image making it easy to frame, find, and focus on stars. Maximum zoom for precise focusing is 15x, good but not as good as the D750’s 20x zoom level, but better than Canon’s 10x maximum zoom in Live View. 

The Z6 lacks the a7III’s wonderful Bright Monitoring function that temporarily ups the ISO to an extreme level, making it much easier to frame a dark night scene. However, something similar can be achieved with the Z6 by switching it temporarily to Movie mode, and having the ISO set to an extreme level.

As with most Nikons (and unlike Sonys), the Z6 remembers separate settings for the still and movie modes, making it easy to switch back and forth, in this case for a temporarily brightened Live View image to aid framing. 

That’s very handy, and the Z6 works better than the D750 in this regard, providing a brighter Live View image, even with the D750’s well-hidden Exposure Preview option turned on. 

Video Capability 

Comparison - Movie Noise Levels
Comparing the three cameras using 1/25-second still frames grabbed from moonlit night movies (HD with the D750 and 4K with the Z6 and a7III) shot at ISO 51200, plus a similarly exposed frame from the a7III shot with a shutter speed of only 1/4 second allowing the slower ISO of 8000.

Where the Z6 pulls far ahead of the otherwise similar D750 is in its movie features.

The Z6 can shoot 4K video (3840 x 2160 pixels) at either 30, 25, or 24 frames per second. Using 24 frames per second and increasing the ISO to between 12,800 to 51,200 (the Z6 can go as high as ISO 204,800!) it is possible to shoot real-time video at night, such as of auroras.

But the auroras will have to be bright, as at 24 fps, the maximum shutter speed is 1/25-second, as you might expect. 

The a7III, by comparison, can shoot 4K movies at “dragged” shutter speeds as slow as 1/4 second, even at 24 fps, making it possible to shoot auroras at lower and less noisy ISO speeds, albeit with some image jerkiness due to the longer exposures per frame. 

The D750 shoots only 1080 HD and, as shown above, produces very noisy movies at ISO 25,600 to 51,200. It’s barely usable for aurora videos.

The Z6 is much cleaner than the D750 at those high ISOs, no doubt due to far better internal processing of the movie frames. However, if night-sky 4K videos are an important goal, a camera from the Sony a7 series will be a better choice, if only because of the option for slower dragged shutter speeds.

For examples of real-time auroras shot with the Sony a7III see my music videos shot in Yellowknife and in Norway. 

Battery Life

Nikon Z6 Battery copy

The Z6 uses the EN-EL15b battery compatible with the battery and charger used for the D750. But the “b” variant allows for in-camera charging via the USB port. 

In room temperature tests the Z6 lasted for 1500 exposures, as many as the D750 was able to take in a side-by-side test. That was with the screens off.

At night, in winter temperatures of -10 degrees C (14° F), the Z6 lasted for three hours worth of continuous shooting, both for long deep-sky exposure sets and for a test time-lapse I shot, shown below. 

A time-lapse movie, downsized here to HD from the full-size originals, shot with the Z6 and its internal intervalometer, from twilight through to moonrise on a winter night. Processed with Camera Raw and LRTimelapse. 

However, with any mirrorless camera, you can extend battery life by minimizing use of the LCD screen and eye-level EVF. The Z6 has a handy and dedicated button for shutting off those screens when they aren’t needed during a shoot.

The days of mirrorless cameras needing a handful of batteries just to get through a few hours of shooting are gone. 

Lens and Telescope Compatibility 

Nikon with Sigma and FTZ copy
A 14mm Sigma Art lens with the Nikon FTZ lens adapter needed to attach any “legacy” F-mount lens to the Z6.

As with all mirrorless cameras, the Nikon Z cameras use a new lens mount, one that is incompatible with the decades-old Nikon F mount. 

The Z mount is wider and can accommodate wider-angle and faster lenses than the old F mount ever could, and in a smaller package. While we have yet to see those lenses appear, in theory that’s the good news.

The bad news is that you’ll need Nikon’s FTZ lens adapter to use any of your existing Nikon F-mount lenses on either the Z6 or Z7. As of this writing, Nikon is supplying an FTZ free with every Z body purchase. 

I got an FTZ with my loaner Z6 and it worked very well, allowing even third-party lenses like my Sigma Art lenses to focus at the same point as they normally do (not true of some thIrd-party adapters), preserving the lens’s optical performance. Autofocus functions all worked fine and fast.

Nikon with Scope Adapter and FTZ copy
The FTZ adapter needed to attach the Z6 to a telescope camera adapter (equipped with a standard Nikon T-ring) and field flattener lens for a refractor.

You’ll also need the FTZ adapter for use on a telescope, as shown above, to go from your telescope’s camera adapter, with its existing Nikon T-ring, to the Z6 body. 

T-rings are becoming available for the Z-mount, but even these third-party adapters are actually extension tubes, not just rings.

The reason is that the field flattener or coma corrector lenses often required with telescopes are designed to work best with the longer lens-to-sensor distance of a DSLR body. The FTZ adapter provides the necessary spacing, as do third-party adapters. 

Nikon Z6 FTZ Foot copy
The FTZ lens adapter has its own tripod foot, useful for balancing front-heavy lenses like the big Sigma here.

The only drawback to the FTZ is that any tripod plate attached to the camera body itself likely has to come off, and the tripod foot incorporated into the FTZ used instead. I found myself often having to swap locations for the tripod plate, an inconvenience. 

Camera Controller Compatibility 

Nikon with Ports copy
The port side of the Z6, with the DC2 shutter remote jack at bottom, and HDMI and USB-C ports above. There’s also a mic and headphone jack for video use.

Since it uses the same Nikon-type DC2 shutter port as the D750, the Z6 it should be compatible with most remote hardware releases and time-lapse motion controllers that operate a Nikon through the shutter port. An example are the controllers from SYRP.

On the other hand, time-lapse devices and external intervalometers that run Nikons through the USB port might need to have their firmware or apps updated to work with the Z6.

For example, as of early May 2019, CamRanger lists the Z6 as a supported camera; the Arsenal “smart controller” does not. Nor does Alpine Labs for their Radian and Pulse controllers, nor TimeLapse+ for its excellent View bramping intervalometer. Check with your supplier.

For those who like to use laptops to run their camera at the telescope, I found the Windows program Astro Photography Tool (v3.63) worked fine with the Z6, in this case connecting to the camera’s USB-C port using the USB-C to USB-A cable that comes with the camera. This allows APT to shift not only shutter speed, but also ISO and aperture under scripted sequences. 

However, BackyardNikon v2.0, current as of April 2019, does not list the Z6 as a supported camera. 

Raw File Compatibility 

Z6 Raw open in Raw Therapee
A Z6 Raw NEF file open in Raw Therapee 5.6, showing good star images and de-Bayering.

Inevitably, raw files from brand new cameras cannot be read by any raw developer programs other than the one supplied by the manufacturer, Nikon Capture NX in this case. However, even by the time I did my testing in winter 2019 all the major software suppliers had updated their programs to open Z6 files. 

Adobe Lightroom and Photoshop, Affinity Photo, DxO PhotoLab, Luminar 3, ON1 PhotoRAW, and the open-source Raw Therapee all open the Z6’s NEF raw files just fine. 

Z6 Raw in PixInsight
PixInsight 1.8.6 failing to open a Z6 raw NEF file.

Specialized programs for processing astronomy images might be another story. For example, as of v1.08.06, PixInsight, a favourite program among astrophotographers, does not open Z6 raw files. Nor does Nebulosity v4. But check with the developers for updates. 

Other Features for Astrophotography 

Here are other Nikon Z6 features I found of value for astrophotography, and for operating the camera at night. 

Nikon with Looking Right copy

Tilting LCD Screen 

Like the Nikon D750 and Sony A7III, the Z6 offers a tilting LCD screen great for use on a telescope or tripod when aimed up at the sky. However, the screen does not flip out and reverse, a feature useful for vloggers, but seldom needed for astrophotography. 

Nikon Z6 Top Screen copy
Showing the top OLED screen and dedicated ISO button that is easy to access in the dark. It works in conjunction with the top dial.

OLED Top Screen (Above)

The Sony doesn’t have one, and Canon’s low-cost mirrorless Rp also lacks one. But the top-mounted OLED screen of the Z6 is a great convenience for astrophotography. It makes it possible to monitor camera status and battery life during a shoot, even with the rear LCD screen turned off to prolong battery life.

Z6 Menu - Quick Menu

Touch Screen 

Sony’s implementation of touch-screen functions is limited to just choosing autofocus points. By contrast, the Nikon Z6 offers a full range of touchscreen functions, making it easy to navigate menus and choose settings. 

I do wish there was an option, as there is with Pentax, to tint the menus red for preserving night vision.

Z6 Menu - Intervalometer

Built-in Intervalometer

As with other Nikons, the Z6 offers an internal intervalometer capable of shooting time-lapses, just as long as individual exposures don’t need to be longer than 30 seconds. 

In addition, there’s the Exposure Smoothing option which, as I have found with the D750, is great for smoothing flickering in time-lapses shot using auto exposure. 

Sony has only just added an intervalometer to the a7III with their v3 firmware update, but with no exposure smoothing. 

Z6 Menu - Silent Shooting

Custom i Menu / Custom Function Buttons 

The Sony a7III has four custom function buttons users can assign to commonly used commands, for quick access. For example, I assign one Custom button to the Bright Monitoring function which is otherwise utterly hidden in the menus, but superb for framing nightscapes, if only you know it’s there! 

The Nikon Z6 has two custom buttons beside the lens mount. However, I found it easier to use the “i” menu (shown above) by populating it with those functions I use at night for astrophotography. It’s then easy to call them up and adjust them on the touch screen.

Thankfully, the Z6’s dedicated ISO button is now on top of the camera, making it much easier to find at night than the awkwardly placed ISO button on the back of the D750, which I am always mistaking for the Image Quality button, which you do not want to adjust by mistake. 

Nikon Z6-My Menu

My Menu 

As most cameras do, the Z6 also has a “My Menu” page which you can also populate with favourite menu commands. 

Nikon D750 and Z6 copy
The D750 (left) compared to the smaller and lighter Z6 (right). This shows the wider Z lens mount compared to Nikon’s old F-mount standard.

Lighter Weight / Smaller Size

The Z6 provides similar imaging performance, if not better (for movies) than the D750, and in a smaller and lighter camera, weighing 200 grams (0.44 pounds) less than the D750. Being able to downsize my equipment mass is a welcome plus to going mirrorless.

Comparison - Z6 Mech vs Silent Shutter
Extreme 800% blow-ups of the Moon show a slightly sharper image with the Z6 set to Silent Shutter.

Electronic Front Curtain Shutter / Silent Shooting 

By design, mirrorless cameras lack any vibration from a bouncing mirror. But even the mechanical shutter can impart vibration and blurring to high-magnification images taken through telescopes. 

The electronic front curtain shutter (lacking in the D750) helps eliminate this, while the Silent Shooting mode does just that — it makes the Z6 utterly quiet and vibration free when shooting, as all the shutter functions are now electronic. This is great for lunar and planetary imaging. 

What’s Missing for Astrophotography (not much!)

Bulb Timer for Long Exposures

While the Z6 has a Bulb setting, there is no Bulb Timer as there is with Canon’s recent cameras. A Bulb Timer would allow setting long Bulb exposures of any length in the camera, though Canon’s cannot be combined with the intervalometer. 

Instead, the Nikon must be used with an external Intervalometer for any exposures over 30 seconds long. Any number of units are compatible with the Z6, through its shutter port which is the same type DC2 jack used in the D750.

Z6 Menu - Multiple Exposures

In-Camera Image Stacking to Raws

The Z6 does offer the ability to stack up to 10 images in the camera, a feature also offered by Canon and Pentax. Images can be blended with a Lighten (for star trails) or Average (for noise smoothing) mode. 

However, unlike with Canon and Pentax, the result is a compressed JPG not a raw file, making this feature of little value for serious imaging. Plus with a maximum of only 10 exposures of up to 30-seconds each, the ability to stack star trails “in camera” is limited. 

Illuminated Buttons 

Unlike the top-end D850, the Z6’s buttons are not illuminated, but then again neither are the Z7’s.

As a bonus — the Nikon 35mm S-Series Lens

Nikkor 35mm Lens Test
The upper left frame corner of a tracked star image shot with the 35mm S lens wide open at f/1.8 and stopped down at third stop increments.

With the Z6 I also received a Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 S lens made for the Z-mount, as the lens perhaps best suited for nightscape imaging out of the native Z-mount lenses from Nikon. See Nikon’s website for the listing. 

If there’s a downside to the Z-series Nikons it’s the limited number of native lenses that are available now from Nikon, and likely in the future from anyone, due to Nikon not making it easy for other lens companies to design for the new Z mount. 

In testing the 35mm Nikkor on tracked shots, stars showed excellent on- and off-axis image quality, even wide open at f/1.8. Coma, astigmatism, spherical aberration, and lateral chromatic aberration were all well controlled. 

However, as with most lenses now offered for mirrorless cameras, the focus is “by-wire” using a ring that doesn’t mechanically adjust the focus. As a result, the focus ring turns continuously and lacks a focus scale. 

So it is not possible to manually preset the lens to an infinity mark, as nightscape photographers often like to do. Focusing must be done each night. 

Until there is a greater selection of native lenses for the Z cameras, astrophotographers will need to use the FTZ adapter and their existing Nikon F-mount or third-party Nikon-mount lenses with the Zs.


I was impressed with the Z6. 

The Owl Nebula and Messier 108 Galaxy
The Owl Nebula, Messier 97, a planetary nebula in our galaxy, and the edge-on spiral galaxy Messier 108, paired below the Bowl of the Big Dipper in Ursa Major. This is a stack of 5 x 4-minute exposures at ISO 1600 with the Nikon Z6 taken as part of testing. This was through the Astro-Physics Traveler refractor at f/6 with the Hotech field flattener and FTZ adapter.

For any owner of a Nikon cropped-frame DSLR (from the 3000, 5000, or 7000 series for example) wanting to upgrade to full-frame for astrophotography I would suggest moving to the Z6 over choosing a current DSLR. 

Mirrorless is the way of the future. And the Z6 will yield lower noise than most, if not all, of Nikon’s cropped-frame cameras.

Nikkor 35mm S Lens copy
The Z6 with the Nikkor 35mm f/1.8 S lens native for the Z mount.

For owners of current Nikon DSLRs, especially a 24-megapixel camera such as the D750, moving to a Z6 will not provide a significant improvement in image quality for still images. 

But … it will provide 4K video and much better low-light video performance than older DSLRs. So if it is aurora videos you are after, the Z6 will work well, though not quite as well as a Sony alpha. 

In all, there’s little downside to the Z6 for astrophotography, and some significant advantages: low noise, bright live view, clean artifact-free sensor images, touchscreen convenience, silent shooting, low-light 4K video, all in a lighter weight body than most full-frame DSLRs. 

I highly recommend the Nikon Z6. 

— Alan, April 30, 2019 / © 2019 Alan Dyer / AmazingSky.com 



60 Replies to “Testing the Nikon Z6 for Astrophotography”

  1. Hi Allen,

    Awesome blog post!

    Have you had a chance to use the Z6 with narrow band filters yet?

      1. I am at a window trying to decide between the Z 7ii and the Z 6ii but according to your blog the lesser MP 24vs40ish does better job for noise

        I want a full frame so I can dual purpose Terrestrial and DSO instead of getting a full frame Astro camera $$$

        What is your opinion over the 7vs the 6 ?

        Astronomy & Computer Consulting

        STEPHEN GRIFFITHS Astronomy | Astrophotography Club

        stephen@whfl.us stephen@whfl.us | https://www.astrocomputer.net https://www.astrocomputer.net

      2. I’ve not used a Z7 or Z7II. But I do use a similar megapixel Canon R5 and it works very well. See my review of it on my blog from a few weeks ago. Of course, by the time you decide what to buy the 7ZIII will be out!

  2. I just got the Z6 ii. You can now have a shutter speed up to 15 minutes long(900 seconds). The Time Lapse on the menu allows for this extended shutter speed too. So there are no more 30 second limits. I tried doing a picture of the Orion Nebula this week near Atlanta and found that anything over 60 seconds made the picture too bright. I used 2000 ISO using the 24-70mm lens at F/4, 70mm. I found that 30 seconds was long enough to keep the sky from overexposed. I used a tracker, no telescope. Should I use the LENR for this? Also, the timelapse on the menu asks for # shots/interval. What is this for? Should it always be 1? Would you ever need more than 1?

    1. Hi, the Z6 II sounds like a great camera. I was wondering if the extra long exposures could be combined with the Intervalometer. The D810a had a similar range of long exposures but I think you could fire only one at a time and not set up a programmed series. LENR might not be needed for short exposures and on cool nights. But take shots with and without and see if there’s a difference. Where you will see the noise LENR can eliminate is in high ISO shots of dark Nightscapes where the hot pixels can pepper the ground, especially on warm nights. The shots/interval is for shooting HDR time lapses I think where the number of shots equals the number you have set for a bracketed set of exposures. The Nikon camera manual might explain that, but perhaps not. Cheers!

  3. Alan, I sometimes use my DSLR D750 on my Obsession 20″ scope to do some rudimentary astrophotography but have to use a set of shorter truss poles to achieve focus as my focuser won’t rack in far enough with the normal truss poles. Will the Z6 or any other mirrorless cameras for that matter solve this problem for me since the sensor on mirrorless cameras are closer to the telescope? Are there mirrorless camera 2″ nose-piece adapters for telescopes. Hope this makes sense.

  4. Thanks for this review. I have been trying to decide between the Z6 and the D750. Either would represent an upgrade from my old Nikon D40. Which would you recommend?

    1. Hello — I think these days the choice would be between the D780 and the Z6, though the D750 certainly remains an excellent camera. But the D780 has some significant improvements. At lot depends on what and how many Nikon F-mount lenses you have and need to adapt to a Z6 vs use natively on a DSLR. Not having used a D780 I’m not sure how bright its Live View image is for night use vs a Z6. Or whether you prefer to have an optical viewfinder. Ease of framing and focusing night scenes is key. The Z6 has the advantage over the D750 but I don’t know about the D780. I’d also check DPReview.com for noise tests but I suspect they are similar.

      1. Thank you for your response. Having reviewed both the Sony A7 III and the Nikon Z6, which of the two would you recommend for astrophotography?


      2. See my blog post on testing the Sony A7III. I would not recommend it for, nor do I use it for deep sky photography. The Z6 is better. The Sony is very good for nightscapes and aurora movies, with the A7III better than the Z6 for low-light real-time video shooting at 4K.

  5. Hi Alan,
    thanks for that great review. I just updated to a Nikon Z6 and went Star Trail shooting last week. I had a problem I cannot understand: I had my intervals set at 31 seconds, 1 pic per interval and a shutter speed of 30 seconds, manual focus, noise reduction off. Somehow, the camera only managed to shoot 80/150 pictures (card and battery were not the problem…). Can you tell me what I did wrong? I am kind of new to all this…

    1. Hello. Set your interval to 33 seconds. A 30 second exposure is really 32 seconds, true of most cameras. So the interval needs to be 33. A 15 second exposure is really for 16 seconds. So the interval needs to be 17. All explained in my ebook! Always test settings before committing to a long shoot. Clear skies!

      1. Thanks! I kind of understand.
        Would an exposure of, say, 25 seconds amd an interval of 27 work or is 25 not enough for a trail?

      2. Test the interval settings at home to see what setting produces the minimum gap in time between exposures. Star trails can be taken with any shutter speed if you are stacking the images later. But 30 seconds is good.

  6. Alan, regarding your sensor illumination (amplifier glow) study, do you think the difference in exposure time – 4 minutes for the Nikon Z6 and 8 minutes for the Sony A7iii might make a difference? I mean, obviously the Sony exhibits the problem, but would the Nikon also exhibit the problem with an 8 minute exposure time, or do you think 4 minutes was sufficient to expose any problems?

    1. No I don’t think so. I never saw an amp glow issues with the Z6. And Spencer’s Cameras lists the Sony as one they do not recommend modifying due to the glow, though they don’t list the Z6 as a good or bad model. You might check with them on their experience, and with other third party modifiers.

  7. Mr. Dyer,

    Excellent review but one question. Why use movie mode instead of photo mode with your settings for iso, shutter speed (1/25) and Hi iso? The only reason I can think of is to quickly switch from focusing to taking pictures by switching to already set up still image settings. Is that the reason? Thanks

  8. Superb review thank you!
    I was just hesitating between a Nikon Z6, Z7 or Sony Alpha 7 III because I like to take photos of city nights but also the night sky.
    So in conclusion according to the two reviews I just saw (this and the Sony Alpha 7 III) you suggest the Nikon Z6 more than the Sony Alpha 7 III or the Nikon Z7?
    PS: Sorry for my English , I’m from Switzerland

    1. Hello Mauro, for most nighttime photography any of those cameras will work well. But I like the Z6 best for deep-sky photography, such as through a telescope. That might not be what you intend to do. A lot depends on what lenses you might have now or want to buy and what can be adapted to those cameras if you don’t use their native lenses (Nikon and Sony have a limited number of their own lenses that are ideal for astrophotography.) I hope this helps! — Alan

  9. Alan, I read recently of Canon’s EOS Ra release. Essentially an astro focussed adaption of the R , with IR filter removed etc. Do you have any thoughts about how the (unmodified) Z might now compare with this?

    1. Hi, Have you not seen my blog post on the EOS Ra? It will always outperform any stock camera for recording red nebulas. You would have to modify the IR filter in a Z6, or any other camera, to match or exceed the Ra for red sensitivity. Spencer’s Cameras sells modified Z6’s I think.

    2. Sorry, I’m relatively new to your world. I already have a Z6, that I’m just getting to grips with for lunar studies. Wide field soon as the cold winter sky sets in. (Scotland). Thanks.

  10. Alan – this is a brilliant article – thank you – I am going to purchase one of these cameras. Can you confirm what bits I need to connect it to my Explore Scientific ED102 triplet telescope? I was confused at the t-ring bit. I have a standard t-ring for nikon d610, and believe I can attach that to the FTZ adaptor – I think I then need an extension tube. Is that the product you linked to here: https://www.telescopeadapters.com/t-rings-for-mirrorless-interchangeable-lens-mil/581-t-ring-for-nikon-z-mirrorless-cameras-tnikz.html

    I dont think i need a field flattener given i have the triplet APO – but your thoughts there very welcome!



    1. Hi Jim – I reviewed the FCD100 in a 2017 issue of Sky and Telescope – not sure which issue. It works very well. Yes, you need a camera adapter – Explore has one – which accepts a T-ring which is normally all you need. But there is no T-Ring for the Z mounts I think. So you need a T-ring for a Nikon F mount then the Z to F lens adapter from Nikon. It’s what I tested. It works well.

      With a full frame camera like a Z6 I think you might need the Explore Scientific field flattener as well but perhaps try it without at first then add it if needed.

      But I’d stay with the Explore accessories to make sure all in compatible.

      The field flattener is not for correcting chromatic aberration but field curvature, present in even the best apo refractors. I have to use one with my Astro-Physics apos. Hope this helps. — Alan

  11. Great Review, I have a Nikon Z6, I do some landscape astro photography and occasionally use tracker too. I am planning to buy a native prime lens and considering Z 35mm f/1.8 or Z 50mm f/1.8. I understand from your review that 35mm S lens did well for atro, did you get a chance to try 50mm for astro photography, if so which one would you recommend?

  12. I already own a z6 but was completely unaware of many of the features and functions that your review highlights. For me the main let down is the functionality of the SnapBridge app. E.g. it disables the camera body buttons and the live view. As others have noted, this review (the first of yours I have read) is truly excellent. The best camera review I have read. Thank you so much for taking the time.

  13. I’ve been shooting ‘stars’ for many years of the Hollywood-type. Most are pleasant, but you still have to deal with publicists, studios and attitudes. I’m a ‘rookie’ shooting real-stars and your review and insights to the Nikon Z6 is fantastic! No publicists, attitudes to contend with — only peace and serenity of an evening sky. Thank you. Now all’s that is needed is for ALL manufacturers to bring camera and lens prices back-to-earth!

  14. Congratulations on the article, very interesting and in-depth.
    I found it looking for “chromatic noise nikon z6”, after noticing so much chromatic noise in night photos, in which I recovered the exposure.
    My case is like the one in your comparative photo on the “ISO invariance”:
    Many red, green and blue dots.
    Comparing this file with those of my D750, I was really disappointed with the Z6.
    Colored dots can appear as early as +3 exposure to ISO 100 with Lightroom (never happened with the D750).
    I’m testing the same image in Captur NX-D, and the results are different there. Activating “Astro Noise Reduction” the colored dots almost disappear. But I’m still doing tests.
    Based on this I wanted to ask you, do you really think it is a machine that is worth buying at present, compared to the D750 (or other Nikon reflex)?
    (I by now bought it -_-)
    Maybe the problem is the support of Camera RAW or even an immaturity of Nikon in releasing systems not tested properly. IMHO
    Thanks in advance and sorry for my bad English.

    1. Hello, what you are seeing are hot pixels which get worse with warmer nights and longer exposures. Using LENR largely eliminates this. The D750 is just as prone to these coloured pixels as I found out the other night when I forgot to turn on LENR for a 5 minute exposure on a warm night. Take comparison shots with both cameras under the same conditions at the same time with identical settings and with and without LENR to truly compare the cameras.
      Clear skies! – Alan

  15. Hi Alan, I appreciate your articles very much !

    Based on your info regarding the value of a big LENR buffer, I am now trying to find myself a used 6D (not mk II) as my first FF camera for deep sky imaging. Four dark calibrated frames to the cost of one would be a good deal.

    As you say, it does not work when controlled via usb. Would I have to diconnect the usb before even starting the intervalometer (frame #1), or maybe I can have the usb active (and review images as they get completed on a tablet), and just disconnect the usb before frame #4 is completed ? Can you tell if that would be possible ?
    I do tethered (portable) astro imaging now, with a Nikon, and I really appreciate having a tablet (Android with the “qdslrdashboard” app) on a small table. This way I can control the camera and review images (but my D7000 still needs an intervalometer for bulb shooting).

    Also, can you tell if the 6D (WG model) would apply the same restrictions to a wifi connection as the usb connection, regarding the LENR buffer ?

    And just one last D6 question, the user manual says about LENR (page 129) that
    “Images taken at ISO 1600 or higher may look grainier with the [Enable] setting than with the [Disable] or [Auto] setting”
    Is that a problem ? What ISO would you recommend for LENR dso shooting ?

    Thanks – Ragnar

    1. Hello, I’m not sure if connecting a 6D to a device via WiFi will disable the LENR buffer. I never operate cameras in the field with WiFi as I’ve found just establishing the connection let alone maintaining it too much of a pain. I’ve never noticed any difference in noise when using LENR above 1600 ISO, vs without LENR. For tracked deep sky I usually shoot at 800 or 1600. For nightscapes ISO might be 3200 or 6400. But for deep sky shooting where you can give the image as much exposure time as needed, I prefer the 6D MkII. The flip out screen is great but its LENR buffer is only 3 raw files. I set the Intervalometer to take 7 shots and I get 6 full exposures with dark frames reduced in the time it takes to shoot 8 images, I.e. two darks plus 6 lights. Works fine. It’s only in nightscapes where the MkII’s poor shadow performance/dynamic range and non ISO invariant behaviour is a detriment. For deep sky it’s fine. I’ll be interested to try an EOS R especially if rumours of an EOS Ra model prove correct. If you want to shoot deep sky you’ll want a modified camera.

  16. Great review as always, Alan.

    After using and trying many cameras over many years, my “essentials” list for long-exposure astrophotography has reduced to (highest preference first):
    1. Must have good H-alpha sensitivity without modification
    2. Must not have “amp glow”, nor “star-eating”, bias-clipping, or other RAW fiddling
    3. Must have a tilt screen
    4. Must have good overall quantum efficiency and low internal noise

    It is amazing how nearly all cameras fail on at least one of these. Number 4 is now pretty standard, and number 3 is becoming more and more common. But number 2 is troublesome for many cameras (just about all Sonys, and many Nikons and Fujis). And number 1 is the rarest of all. Fuji alone seems to be dedicated to delivering number 1 across their range: I’d rate the H-alpha sensitivity of their X-A3 alongside the D810A or Canon 60Da, for example – and it also delivers on numbers 2 to 4, all at a fraction of the price.

    All this is the build up to my comment on the Z6: you’ve shown that it ticks numbers 2, 3, and 4. But I’d still have concerns about number 1. That shot of the Owl Nebula is really lacking in H-alpha. And your M42/M43 comparison seems to have slightly better H-alpha with the D750 than the Z6; that’s the D750 which is only “moderately” H-alpha sensitive, some way behind the D810A for example. I’d love to see more testing of the Z6 in this regard.

    1. Hi, I only had the Z6 on loan for a couple of weeks so didn’t have a chance to test it under dark skies on H-alpha areas as I would have liked. But I would not expect it to be any better than any other stock Nikon as they’d be using the same IR cut filter. If you are happy with Fuji’s then there’s little need to seek out a better Nikon. If you have published results showing the Fuji advantage over other brands I’d love to see them. Thanks! – Alan

    2. I’m noticing a slightly worse Ha sensitivity on the z6,z6ii and z7ii when compared to the d850. I suppose I’d have to modify the z6. Would you recommend a Ha mod or full spectrum?

      1. Hello, unless you want to also shoot infrared landscape scenes, I’d get the H-alpha mod for astronomy. Otherwise you’d just have to buy and install an IR cut filter someplace in the imaging train. Clear skies!

  17. Hi Alan
    Just wondered if you had any plans or interest in reviewing the Panasonic s1 for astro?. Looks a very interesting and capable night shooter.

    1. I have no plans to buy one to try it. If Panasonic wants to send me one to test I’ll be happy to do so. It’s not clear what it does or has that would make it better than the more popular models from Canon, Nikon, or Sony. But for someone committed to the Panasonic system I’m sure it would work well.

      1. Alan, I haven’t been able to compare the Fujis side by side with the best of other brands (except my old Canon 5D II, which they trounce in the H-alpha stakes). So I base my “rate…alongside the D810A and 60DA” conclusion on a comparison of other people’s images to my own, for example Cygnus with the Fuji X-A3: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=2636059273079444&set=a.222058537812875&type=3&theater

        Not the most scientific basis I know, but sometimes the results speak for themselves.

        BTW, I use the Fujis that have a standard Bayer CFA (X-A series, X-T100). No personal experience with the X-trans CFA line of camera; I believe their UVIR filter cutoff is equally generous on the H-alpha side, but they do have a smaller ratio of R pixels in the RGB mix. And the Bayer CFA sensors work in all image processing software like Deep Sky Stacker, while some software doesn’t like the X-trans CFA.

      2. Yes, I’d stay away from Xtrans sensors as so much software doesn’t work well with those files. And as one student in a Workshop remarked, no instructor ever knows how to deal with them! I’m not sure I do!

  18. Very nIce review Alan. As soon as the z6 was released I wondered how it would fare for astrophotography. It was hard to find reviews targeting the astrophotographers out there. Concise, comprehensive and thorough!

  19. Nicely done reveiw. Great that you do a very comprehensive reveiw based upon your criteria versus most other reveiws that sèm to be the reading of the camera specs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: